How this assessment works
00 · OverviewThe assessment measures how ready your organisation is for a changing climate. It looks at seven dimensions of resilience, from governance and risk understanding through to your assets, people, value chain, monitoring and the opportunities a warmer world creates. Each dimension is a small set of questions, and the whole set takes 10 to 15 minutes for a first read.
Its purpose is a shared language: operations, finance, risk and sustainability answer one set of questions on one scale, so they can agree on where the company stands and what comes next. This assessment covers physical climate risk and adaptation measures. Transition risk and decarbonisation are outside its scope.
Every question is answered on the same five-level scale, graded A (Advanced) down to E (Passive), so a bank, an insurer and a manufacturer all describe themselves in the same terms. Answer for how things are today; plans count once they are in place. If a topic does not apply to your business model, you mark it "Not relevant for us". If it applies but you cannot answer it, you mark it "Don't know / not my area": the question then appears in your result as an open question for the colleagues who know, and each dimension names the functions that usually do. Both leave the score. Each answer becomes a score from 4 down to 0; a dimension is the average of its answered questions, and the overall result is the average across the scored dimensions, shown to one decimal place. The result shows your profile across the dimensions first and the overall grade second, because one number can hide a wide spread between strong and weak dimensions. The aim is an honest baseline and a clear set of priorities, not a precise number.
The questions and criteria are the same for everyone. What changes is the advice at the end: at the start you pick one of three archetypes (real economy, services, financial services), and the tool filters its recommendation library to the actions that fit your business model. Each priority gap comes with concrete next steps, grouped by where you stand today, and links to the matching solution categories in the WG3 Adaptation Stack. Below you can open any dimension to see its questions, the full criteria for every level, and the recommendations behind them.
Five maturity levels
01 · The scaleEvery question is answered on the same five-level scale, graded A to E. Passive (E) is the red flag (no structured adaptation activity); Advanced (A) is the top level (adaptation as a strategic differentiator). The levels in between describe a realistic progression for most organisations. Any question can be marked not relevant, so it does not drag the score.
Strategic differentiator; benchmark for peers.
Robust programme; material risks actively managed.
Programme exists; coverage and execution uneven.
Recognised; activity ad-hoc and reactive.
No structured activity; risks unmanaged. Red flag.
Three archetype lenses
02 · Tailored recommendationsThe questions and criteria are the same for everyone, the diagnostic is common by design. What changes is the set of recommended actions you receive. At setup you choose one of three archetypes, and the tool filters the library to actions that fit your business model. Financial services use a lean, portfolio-oriented variant.
The recommendation library is organised in three steps per dimension. Start holds the actions for a dimension at Passive or Entry, Build the actions for Developing, and Lead the actions for Established or Advanced. Every action names the question it moves forward (for example G1.3), so you can trace each recommendation back to an answer. In your result, the actions linked to your weakest answers come first.
Real economy
Manufacturing, energy, agri, mining. Asset- and supply-chain-heavy operations exposed to climate hazards.
Services providers
Services, retail, health, tech. People- and continuity-driven operations, often heat- and disruption-sensitive.
Financial services provider
Insurer, bank, investor. Resilience sits in the portfolio; a lean, portfolio-oriented variant of the assessment.
The seven dimensions
03 · Questions, criteria, recommendationsClick any dimension to open it. Each block contains the dimension description, its questions with their full five-level criteria, the recommendation library grouped by maturity tier, and the matching WG3 solution categories.
1Governance & Strategy
Board oversight, strategy, capital allocation, organisation.
View
Governance & Strategy
Board oversight, strategy, capital allocation, organisation.
Board-level accountability for climate adaptation, how it is reflected in strategy, capex/opex planning and how the topic is organised below board level.
Usually answered by: Strategy, sustainability, corporate risk, board office
Questions & criteria
G1.1Are adaptation measures against physical climate risk explicitly part of your corporate strategy?Criteria
Looks at commitments, targets and measures, not just statements of intent.
G1.2Does the board receive regular reporting on climate-related risks and progress on adaptation measures?Criteria
Board-level visibility of both risk assessment and adaptation measures.
G1.3Do you have documented adaptation targets with timelines and owners?Criteria
Concrete, assigned, time-bound targets.
G1.4Is climate adaptation considered in your financial planning (capex and opex budgets)?Criteria
Whether the costs and benefits of adaptation measures enter the budgeting process. Spend counts even if it is budgeted under general risk, maintenance or engineering.
G1.5Below board level, is responsibility for adaptation measures clearly assigned and is cross-departmental cooperation organised?Criteria
Where the topic sits operationally and how functions work together. A central unit and a model run through the line functions both count. What matters: responsibility is named and cooperation is organised.
Recommendations (19)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Governance & Strategy, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Add climate adaptation to the board charter, name an accountable director and add it to the standing agenda.
Name one executive sponsor for adaptation measures, with a clear mandate and a reporting line to the board. Day-to-day responsibility can stay in the functions.
Agree three to five adaptation targets for the next 12 months, each with an owner and a date.
Give the chief risk officer (CRO) explicit authority over physical-risk underwriting appetite, reinsurance strategy and catastrophe-model governance.
Write physical-climate adaptation into the credit risk committee mandate, with quarterly reporting on exposed segments.
Publish a clear stewardship position on climate adaptation, with voting and engagement priorities for investee companies.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Write adaptation objectives into the strategic plan with named projects, capex lines and measurable milestones.
Add a planning line for adaptation measures to the next capex and opex cycle, derived from the identified climate risks.
Name the responsible people in operations, procurement, finance, risk and HR and bring them together in a fixed quarterly format.
Report to the board at least once a year on climate risk and on progress of the adaptation measures.
Set underwriting guidelines, peril loads and portfolio limits explicitly reflecting physical-climate adaptation requirements.
Embed physical-climate adaptation considerations in credit policy, risk appetite statement and sector playbooks.
Integrate adaptation criteria into investment policy, mandate design and manager selection frameworks.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Include adaptation milestones in long-term incentive plans for the executive team.
State adaptation as a board-level strategic priority with multi-year capex and external commitment.
Move governance disclosure from compliance to a capital-markets narrative, aligned with IFRS S2 and, in the EU, ESRS E1.
Make the underwriting-adaptation stance public and investor-grade; differentiate on resilience in chosen markets.
Announce an adaptation-finance strategy with product targets, portfolio share commitments and public progress reporting.
Convene or co-lead a stewardship coalition on adaptation across asset owners and managers, with shared expectations of investees.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
2Risk & Impact Understanding
Physical-risk identification, scenarios, forward-looking information.
View
Risk & Impact Understanding
Physical-risk identification, scenarios, forward-looking information.
How systematically climate hazards are identified across operations, assets and value chain, assessed under multiple scenarios and time horizons, and integrated into enterprise risk management.
Usually answered by: Enterprise risk management, sustainability, insurance
Questions & criteria
R2.1Has the organisation conducted a physical climate risk assessment of its assets and operations?Criteria
Existence and scope of a physical risk assessment.
R2.2Are climate risks assessed under multiple scenarios (warming paths) and time horizons?Criteria
Whether you test several warming scenarios across several time horizons.
R2.3Is climate risk integrated into the enterprise risk management (ERM) framework?Criteria
Whether climate sits inside ERM rather than as a side process.
R2.4Which data do you use to assess climate hazards: past loss data only, or also forward-looking information?Criteria
Forward-looking information means (1) climate projections and climate scenario analysis for the coming decades and (2) short-term forecasts and early-warning services. Past loss data means records of natural catastrophe (NatCat) damage.
Recommendations (20)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Risk & Impact Understanding, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Screen all sites and key exposures against the climate hazards relevant to their locations, using public datasets.
Prioritise the assets, products or revenue streams most exposed to acute and chronic risk.
Add physical climate risk to the corporate risk register, with an owner and a first rating.
Complement past loss records with public climate projections and early-warning services for your main locations.
Audit catastrophe-model coverage across geographies and perils; identify gaps for emerging risks (wildfire, heat, flood).
Overlay the corporate and real-estate loan book against hazard data; flag material geographies and sectors.
Screen listed and private holdings against hazard data; identify concentration on exposed locations and sectors.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Adopt the ISO 14091/14092 frame and embed adaptation risks alongside other enterprise risks.
Run 1.5, 2 and 3+ degree scenario analyses across your top exposures and timeframes.
Translate physical risk into financial value-at-risk, anchored in IFRS S2 expectations.
Bring physical-risk metrics into business unit reviews: every business unit reports on its main climate hazards, mitigations and residual risk.
Embed forward-looking climate loads into technical pricing, with governance around peril parameters and scenarios.
Integrate location-based physical-risk signals into borrower probability of default and loss given default (PD/LGD), covenants and pricing.
Produce portfolio-level climate value-at-risk (VaR) across scenarios; report to investment committee (IC) and asset-owner clients at least annually.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Use scenarios in the 5-year plan, capital allocation and product / pricing decisions.
Publish quantified impact in line with IFRS S2 and, in the EU, ESRS E1.
Base siting, investment and insurance decisions on forward-looking information, refreshed whenever new projections appear.
Build a programme to recalibrate catastrophe models for non-stationary climate, with external review and disclosure.
Integrate portfolio climate-stress outcomes into internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and capital allocation, beyond regulatory exercises.
Roll out consistent climate-risk analytics across asset classes and mandates; use in investment committee (IC) decisions and client reporting.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
3Assets & Operations
Site exposure, adaptive measures, business continuity, climate-informed capex.
View
Assets & Operations
Site exposure, adaptive measures, business continuity, climate-informed capex.
Site-level exposure assessment (modelled and physical), adaptive measures at high-risk sites, climate-informed asset decisions and risk-based upgrade of assets based on potential impacts.
Usually answered by: Site and plant management, engineering, real estate and asset management
Questions & criteria
A3.1Are operating sites assessed for their exposure to climate hazards at site level, both with models and on site?Criteria
Climate hazard models means desk-based climate hazard data; on-site checks means a physical evaluation at the site. On-site checks are expected at priority and high-risk sites; checking more sites also counts.
A3.2Have adaptation measures been implemented at high-risk sites?Criteria
Deployment of concrete adaptation measures at the sites that need it.
A3.3Are new asset decisions (siting, design, investment) influenced by long-term climate projections?Criteria
How long-term climate projections shape siting, design and investment for new assets.
A3.4Are upgrades to existing assets prioritised by climate hazard exposure and business impact?Criteria
Whether upgrades to existing assets are ranked by their climate risk. Upgrades count even if they come from your general risk, maintenance or engineering process.
Recommendations (23)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Assets & Operations, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Rank assets by climate hazard exposure and by revenue and safety criticality; set a triage list.
Develop and test business-continuity plans for the most likely high-impact disruptions.
Overlay all owned and leased sites with climate hazard maps; start with the sites that carry the most revenue or sit on the critical path.
Commission on-the-ground adaptation audits of top-exposed sites; cost-rank mitigation options.
Introduce resilience questions (roof, flood defences, business-continuity plan (BCP)) into property underwriting forms and pricing.
Add physical-resilience diligence to real-estate and project-finance origination for exposed locations.
Embed physical-climate and adaptation diligence in real-asset, infrastructure and real-estate transactions.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Cross-train staff, dual-source critical inputs, mobilise temporary capacity for disruption windows.
Make long-term climate projections a required input for every major siting, design and investment decision.
Flood walls, raised plant, redundant cooling and backup power at top-exposed sites.
Permeable surfaces, vegetation, urban canopy and sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) to reduce flood, heat and drought risk.
Condition coverage on adaptation measures (flood defences, wildfire defensible space, business-continuity plans (BCPs)); reflect in pricing.
Scale pre-loss engineering and risk-mitigation advisory across the commercial book; embed in renewal process.
Require borrower resilience measures (design thresholds, business-continuity plans (BCPs)) as conditions precedent for exposed projects.
Offer pricing concessions to borrowers that evidence adaptation investment in exposed assets.
Write adaptation capex (physical reinforcement, redundancy) into real-asset business plans; track as a value-creation lever.
Deploy nature-based solutions (green roofs, wetlands, urban canopy) across real-asset portfolios.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Multi-year capex roadmap mixing green and grey investment, anchored in scenario analysis.
Move from pilots to portfolio-wide green infrastructure with measured co-benefits.
Set design standards for new assets that keep later adaptation possible: space, load reserves, modular upgrades.
Offer premium discounts or enhanced coverage for validated resilience measures; publish the programme outcomes.
Launch a dedicated adaptation-finance product line (green / resilience-linked / transition) with public targets.
Systematic multi-year resilience capex across the real-asset portfolio, with tracked risk-reduction outcomes.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
4People & Health
Workforce protocols, training, productivity and health.
View
People & Health
Workforce protocols, training, productivity and health.
Operational and workforce protocols for climate hazards with training, and tracking and managing climate-related workforce productivity loss and health impacts.
Usually answered by: Health, safety and environment (HSE), HR, site management
Questions & criteria
P4.1Are operational and workforce protocols for climate hazards (heat, river flood, heavy rain and flash flooding, storm, fire) in place and is the workforce trained on them?Criteria
Whether you have protocols for the climate hazards relevant at each site and train your workforce on them. A global company does not need every protocol everywhere.
P4.2Do you track and manage climate-related workforce productivity loss and health impacts?Criteria
Whether you track and manage the effect of climate on workforce productivity and health.
Recommendations (19)
LibraryEvery recommendation for People & Health, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Codify thresholds, work-rest cycles, hydration and shelter for outdoor and indoor work.
Multi-channel alerting for staff and visitors, with rehearsed escalation procedures.
Assess thermal-stress exposure across operations; deploy controls for outdoor and indoor hot environments.
Review health and life products for heat-related morbidity; adjust pricing, coverage and prevention services.
Review climate-related safety in the branch and office network; invest in cooling, shelter and emergency procedures.
Raise workforce climate-safety (heat, storms) as a standing engagement topic with investee companies.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Structured engagement and impact assessment for high-exposure sites and host communities.
Reskilling and support for workers in operations affected by adaptation-driven change.
Run regular drills and training on each site's climate hazard protocols and record participation.
Record heat days, lost hours and heat-related incidents per site and review them with health and safety and operations.
Develop products addressing climate-sensitive health risks (heat, vector-borne disease, air quality) for clients and employers.
Design lending products for community resilience (SMEs, housing, local infrastructure) in exposed regions.
Set clear stewardship expectations on workforce climate resilience; vote against poor performers.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Adaptation literacy and technical skills across the workforce; partner with local institutions.
Co-invest with local authorities in community-resilience infrastructure around critical sites; publish outcomes.
Use productivity and health data in shift planning, site investment and workforce planning.
Launch parametric products for climate-related health events (heatwaves, extreme weather), with prevention bundled in.
Build an adaptation-finance offer for SMEs, smallholders and low-income segments in exposed regions.
Publish year-on-year stewardship outcomes on workforce and community resilience across investees.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
5Value Chain Resilience
Supplier and customer exposure, diversification, collaboration.
View
Value Chain Resilience
Supplier and customer exposure, diversification, collaboration.
Mapping upstream and downstream climate exposure differentiated by strategic importance, procurement requirements, geographic diversification and supplier collaboration.
Usually answered by: Procurement, supply chain, sales and key account management
Questions & criteria
V5.1Have you mapped the climate exposure of your upstream suppliers?Criteria
Critical suppliers are those whose failure would stop or seriously disrupt your operations. Map them for the climate hazards relevant at their locations, not for a fixed number.
V5.2Is climate resilience a requirement in supplier procurement decisions?Criteria
Climate resilience across the supply chain and suppliers' requirements.
V5.3Have you assessed the climate exposure of your downstream customers and end-markets?Criteria
Material customers, markets or portfolios are those that carry a large share of your revenue or, for financial institutions, of your book. Assess them for the climate hazards relevant to them, not for a fixed number.
V5.4Are critical inputs and operations diversified geographically against climate concentration risk?Criteria
Whether you diversify to reduce climate concentration risk.
V5.5Do you actively collaborate with suppliers on adaptation measures (joint assessments, shared roadmaps)?Criteria
Joint action along the supply chain.
Recommendations (19)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Value Chain Resilience, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Overlay tier-1 suppliers / counterparties against climate hazard data to identify hot spots.
List critical components, ingredients and services with no qualified backup.
List your material customers and markets and check their locations against climate hazard data.
Map reinsurance counterparties against peril concentrations; identify aggregation and correlation risk.
Integrate the borrower's value-chain climate resilience into credit assessments, particularly in sectors with high supply chain concentration.
Make tier-2 climate disclosure and supplier-resilience a top-3 engagement priority for exposed sectors.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Qualify alternates, build buffer stock and dual-source the most exposed inputs or counterparties.
Embed adaptation expectations and reporting in supplier / counterparty terms; pilot with strategic relationships.
Build supplier adaptation capability: training, shared risk tools, pre-qualification criteria.
Apply concentration limits in retrocession and fronting arrangements for correlated climate perils.
Require borrower value-chain resilience disclosures and action plans as covenants for material loans.
Engage investee companies on tier-2 supplier mapping and adaptation disclosure, with escalation pathways.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Joint investment, financing and capability building for strategic suppliers or counterparties in exposed regions.
Go one layer deeper: map the critical tier-2 dependencies behind your critical suppliers in exposed geographies.
Fund adaptation capex at strategic suppliers through dedicated vehicles; lock in long-term supply.
Embed adaptation requirements and support into key customer relationships and tenders.
Active diversification programme for reinsurance counterparties across climate-sensitive perils and regions.
Offer adaptation finance across client value chains (anchor + suppliers + distributors).
Drive portfolio-wide value-chain adaptation transparency through coordinated engagement and benchmarks.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
6Monitoring & Learning
Real-time monitoring, lessons, progress KPIs, benchmarking.
View
Monitoring & Learning
Real-time monitoring, lessons, progress KPIs, benchmarking.
Real-time event monitoring, structured lessons-learned, progress KPIs shared across functions, and benchmarking against peers and standards.
Usually answered by: Risk management, operations, business continuity, controlling
Questions & criteria
M6.1Do you monitor climate events affecting operations in real time?Criteria
Real-time monitoring of climate events as they hit operations.
M6.2Are lessons captured systematically after climate incidents?Criteria
Whether you turn incidents into lessons that update your protocols.
M6.3Do you measure progress on climate resilience and adaptation measures with key performance indicators (KPIs)?Criteria
Progress measurement inside the company, separate from external reporting. A climate adaptation KPI is a figure you track over time, for example the share of high-risk sites with measures in place, downtime from climate events, or the share of critical suppliers mapped. KPIs on risk reduction and on adaptation opportunities both count.
M6.4Do you benchmark your adaptation performance against peers and standards?Criteria
Whether you compare yourself against peers and standards.
Recommendations (19)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Monitoring & Learning, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Move from activity tracking to outcome KPIs at programme and dimension level.
Implement watch indicators for your main climate hazards, integrated with enterprise risk management (ERM) dashboards.
Hold a short structured debrief after each climate incident and record what changes as a result.
Start attributing catastrophe losses to climate signals; build a peril-level attribution framework.
Track portfolio-quality impact after climate events (NPL migration, restructurings) in exposed segments.
Track investee adaptation maturity (this standard or equivalent) across the portfolio year on year.
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Structured after-action reviews after every material disruption, feeding programme updates.
Re-run this assessment yearly; track movement on the radar over time.
Executive dashboard tracking adaptation KPIs by business unit, with thresholds, trends and owner sign-off.
Connect weather and climate hazard alert services to site management at all high-risk sites.
Decompose loss experience by peril, geography and climate signal; feed into pricing and capital models.
Attribute credit-loss experience to climate events and physical-risk drivers for management reporting.
Benchmark portfolio-level adaptation maturity against peers and public commitments.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Move adaptation reporting under external assurance; align with IFRS S2 disclosure expectations.
Participate in cross-industry benchmarks and publish year-on-year progress.
Feed monitoring data into shutdown, rerouting and staffing decisions and into planning.
Invest in predictive, forward-looking climate-loss analytics; share methodology with regulators and markets.
Real-time monitoring of climate-driven credit migration across the portfolio with early-warning triggers.
Publish an annual portfolio resilience report: maturity, stewardship outcomes, scenario impact.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
7Opportunities & Strategic Shift
Opportunity identification, positioning, regulatory anticipation.
View
Opportunities & Strategic Shift
Opportunity identification, positioning, regulatory anticipation.
Turning adaptation into opportunity: identifying adaptation-driven markets, positioning and investment, and anticipating regulatory and market shifts.
Usually answered by: Strategy, business development, product management, R&D
Questions & criteria
O7.1Have you identified adaptation-driven market opportunities (products, services, geographies) and the adaptation economy you could participate in?Criteria
Whether you spot adaptation-driven markets and the wider adaptation economy you could serve.
O7.2Is climate adaptation positioned as a strategic differentiator, backed by investment in adaptation-related products, services or business lines?Criteria
Whether resilience is a market differentiator you actually invest in.
O7.3Do you anticipate regulatory and market shifts that drive adaptation demand, and prepare to capture them?Criteria
Whether you anticipate regulatory and market shifts rather than react to them.
Recommendations (20)
LibraryEvery recommendation for Opportunities & Strategic Shift, grouped by maturity tierShow
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
Workshop and document where adaptation needs intersect with your capabilities, clients or markets.
Segment clients by climate exposure; design conversations for the most exposed.
Audit product and service portfolio for those that become more valuable under a warmer, more volatile climate.
Assign someone to follow adaptation-related regulation, standards and customer requirements and brief management twice a year.
Scan for parametric, index-based and resilience-linked product opportunities across lines of business.
Scope the adaptation-finance pipeline (green, sustainability-linked, resilience-linked) across sectors.
Build a screen for adaptation-themed listed and private-market opportunities (water, cooling, resilient agri).
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
Launch pilots in adaptation-relevant products or services; measure unit economics fast.
Allocate a defined share of research and development (R&D) or innovation spend to adaptation-led innovation with stage gates.
Pick the two or three regulatory and market shifts most relevant to your core business and give each a plan and a budget.
Pilot parametric products (heat, flood, drought, hurricane) for commercial or retail segments.
Pilot resilience-linked loans with KPIs tied to client adaptation investment and outcomes.
Launch a pilot adaptation-themed fund or sleeve; track performance, flows and client demand.
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
Shift capital from stranded exposures into climate-resilient growth markets.
Build market-facing leadership: reporting, partnerships and thought leadership on adaptation.
Commit a share of core revenue to adaptation-relevant products and services; report it year on year.
Take part in standard-setting and industry initiatives so that new adaptation demand meets your offer first.
Build a material, disclosed portfolio of parametric and resilience products; position in the market.
Scale adaptation finance to a material share of the balance sheet; publish targets and track delivery.
Launch a flagship adaptation-themed fund or mandate with clear KPIs, impact reporting and client backing.
Matching solutions in the WG3 stack
How scoring works
04 · From answers to snapshotPick the level that fits
Each question is answered on the five-level scale, A to E (Advanced to Passive). Each level has an explicit criterion; the answer that best matches your situation today is the honest one to pick. If two levels fit, take the lower one.
Not relevant, or don't know
"Not relevant for us" excludes a topic that does not apply to your business model, so it does not drag your maturity down. "Don't know / not my area" excludes a question you cannot answer and lists it in your result as an open question for colleagues. A dimension without any scored answer stays visible in the profile and is labelled with the reason.
Dimension and overall score
Each dimension averages its answered questions into a 0 to 4 score (Passive to Advanced), shown to one decimal place. The overall score is the equal-weighted average across all seven dimensions.
The framework is qualitative-first by design: the goal is an honest baseline and a clear set of priority gaps, not a precise number.
Glossary
05 · Key termsThe terms below carry the same meaning in every question. In the assessment they appear as a mouse-over wherever a question uses them.
- Physical climate risk
- Risk of damage, disruption or loss from climate hazards. Acute: flood, storm, heatwave, wildfire. Chronic: rising temperatures, water scarcity, sea level rise. Transition risk (policy, technology and market change on the way to net zero) is a different topic and outside this assessment.
- Climate hazard
- A climate-related event or trend that can cause harm: heat, river flood, heavy rain and flash flood, storm, wildfire, drought, sea level rise. In this assessment the word never refers to hazardous substances.
- Exposure
- Whether and how strongly a site, supplier or customer lies in the path of a climate hazard.
- Climate resilience
- The ability to anticipate, withstand and recover from climate hazards, and to keep operating and creating value as the climate changes.
- Adaptation measures
- Concrete actions that reduce the harm from climate hazards. Examples: flood barriers, raised electrical equipment, cooling and shading, heat-adjusted shift plans, backup power and water, a second supplier in another region. Measures count even if they run under a general risk, maintenance or engineering label.
- Assets and operations
- Your sites, buildings and equipment and the processes that run on them. Financial services lens: the assets and clients you finance, insure or invest in.
- Forward-looking information
- Climate projections and climate scenario analysis for the coming decades, plus short-term forecasts and early-warning services. The opposite is past loss data.
- Climate scenario analysis
- Testing your exposure under several warming paths (for example one lower and one higher path) and several time horizons (for example 2030, 2040, 2050).
- NatCat
- Natural catastrophe. Past loss data means the record of damage from events such as floods, storms and hail.
- Enterprise risk management (ERM)
- The company-wide process that identifies, rates and steers all major risks, usually with a risk register, named risk owners and regular reporting to the board.
- Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU)
- Planning methods that look for decisions that hold up across many plausible futures, instead of optimising for one forecast.
- Climate adaptation KPI
- A figure you track over time to see whether resilience improves. Examples: share of high-risk sites with measures in place, downtime from climate events, share of critical suppliers mapped.
- Critical supplier
- A supplier whose failure would stop or seriously disrupt your operations.
- Material customers, markets or portfolios
- Those that carry a large share of your revenue or, for financial institutions, of your book.
- Not relevant for us
- The topic does not apply to your business model. The question leaves the score.
- Don't know / not my area
- The topic applies, but you cannot answer it. The question leaves the score and appears in your result as an open question to hand to colleagues.