WG1 · Climate Resilience Maturity Assessment · Methodology · v3.2

How this assessment works

00 · Overview

The assessment measures how ready your organisation is for a changing climate. It looks at seven dimensions of resilience, from governance and risk understanding through to your assets, people, value chain, monitoring and the opportunities a warmer world creates. Each dimension is a small set of questions, and the whole set takes 10 to 15 minutes for a first read.

Its purpose is a shared language: operations, finance, risk and sustainability answer one set of questions on one scale, so they can agree on where the company stands and what comes next. This assessment covers physical climate risk and adaptation measures. Transition risk and decarbonisation are outside its scope.

Every question is answered on the same five-level scale, graded A (Advanced) down to E (Passive), so a bank, an insurer and a manufacturer all describe themselves in the same terms. Answer for how things are today; plans count once they are in place. If a topic does not apply to your business model, you mark it "Not relevant for us". If it applies but you cannot answer it, you mark it "Don't know / not my area": the question then appears in your result as an open question for the colleagues who know, and each dimension names the functions that usually do. Both leave the score. Each answer becomes a score from 4 down to 0; a dimension is the average of its answered questions, and the overall result is the average across the scored dimensions, shown to one decimal place. The result shows your profile across the dimensions first and the overall grade second, because one number can hide a wide spread between strong and weak dimensions. The aim is an honest baseline and a clear set of priorities, not a precise number.

The questions and criteria are the same for everyone. What changes is the advice at the end: at the start you pick one of three archetypes (real economy, services, financial services), and the tool filters its recommendation library to the actions that fit your business model. Each priority gap comes with concrete next steps, grouped by where you stand today, and links to the matching solution categories in the WG3 Adaptation Stack. Below you can open any dimension to see its questions, the full criteria for every level, and the recommendations behind them.

Five maturity levels

01 · The scale

Every question is answered on the same five-level scale, graded A to E. Passive (E) is the red flag (no structured adaptation activity); Advanced (A) is the top level (adaptation as a strategic differentiator). The levels in between describe a realistic progression for most organisations. Any question can be marked not relevant, so it does not drag the score.

AAdvanced

Strategic differentiator; benchmark for peers.

BEstablished

Robust programme; material risks actively managed.

CDeveloping

Programme exists; coverage and execution uneven.

DEntry

Recognised; activity ad-hoc and reactive.

EPassive

No structured activity; risks unmanaged. Red flag.

Three archetype lenses

02 · Tailored recommendations

The questions and criteria are the same for everyone, the diagnostic is common by design. What changes is the set of recommended actions you receive. At setup you choose one of three archetypes, and the tool filters the library to actions that fit your business model. Financial services use a lean, portfolio-oriented variant.

The recommendation library is organised in three steps per dimension. Start holds the actions for a dimension at Passive or Entry, Build the actions for Developing, and Lead the actions for Established or Advanced. Every action names the question it moves forward (for example G1.3), so you can trace each recommendation back to an answer. In your result, the actions linked to your weakest answers come first.

Archetype 01

Real economy

Manufacturing, energy, agri, mining. Asset- and supply-chain-heavy operations exposed to climate hazards.

Archetype 02

Services providers

Services, retail, health, tech. People- and continuity-driven operations, often heat- and disruption-sensitive.

Archetype 03

Financial services provider

Insurer, bank, investor. Resilience sits in the portfolio; a lean, portfolio-oriented variant of the assessment.

The seven dimensions

03 · Questions, criteria, recommendations

Click any dimension to open it. Each block contains the dimension description, its questions with their full five-level criteria, the recommendation library grouped by maturity tier, and the matching WG3 solution categories.

1

Governance & Strategy

Board oversight, strategy, capital allocation, organisation.

View

Board-level accountability for climate adaptation, how it is reflected in strategy, capex/opex planning and how the topic is organised below board level.

Usually answered by: Strategy, sustainability, corporate risk, board office

Questions & criteria

G1.1Are adaptation measures against physical climate risk explicitly part of your corporate strategy?Criteria

Looks at commitments, targets and measures, not just statements of intent.

A
Advanced
Adaptation measures are a core, board-owned pillar of strategy with measurable goals and resourcing.
B
Established
Adaptation measures embedded in strategy with targets and resources.
C
Developing
Climate adaptation referenced in strategy with general commitments.
D
Entry
Mentioned in ad-hoc statements, no commitments.
E
Passive
Not addressed in strategy.
G1.2Does the board receive regular reporting on climate-related risks and progress on adaptation measures?Criteria

Board-level visibility of both risk assessment and adaptation measures.

A
Advanced
The board steers: it sets key performance indicators (KPIs) for adaptation measures, holds named executives accountable and decides on the basis of the reports.
B
Established
Fixed reporting cycle: at least once a year the board receives a report on climate risk and on progress of the adaptation measures.
C
Developing
The board discusses climate risk and adaptation measures from time to time, without a fixed reporting cycle.
D
Entry
The board sees climate risk only through legally required reporting and nothing on adaptation measures.
E
Passive
No board-level visibility or only ad-hoc reporting.
G1.3Do you have documented adaptation targets with timelines and owners?Criteria

Concrete, assigned, time-bound targets.

A
Advanced
Targets cascaded, tracked and reviewed, tied to incentives.
B
Established
Documented targets with timelines and clear ownership across functions.
C
Developing
Some documented targets with owners.
D
Entry
Informal or aspirational targets, no owners.
E
Passive
No documented adaptation targets.
G1.4Is climate adaptation considered in your financial planning (capex and opex budgets)?Criteria

Whether the costs and benefits of adaptation measures enter the budgeting process. Spend counts even if it is budgeted under general risk, maintenance or engineering.

A
Advanced
Adaptation costs are a mandatory line in every planning cycle, derived from the identified climate risks.
B
Established
Adaptation costs are planned against identified climate risks in capex and opex budgets.
C
Developing
Adaptation is mentioned in financial planning, without figures.
D
Entry
Occasional ad-hoc spend, no planning line.
E
Passive
Not considered in financial planning.
G1.5Below board level, is responsibility for adaptation measures clearly assigned and is cross-departmental cooperation organised?Criteria

Where the topic sits operationally and how functions work together. A central unit and a model run through the line functions both count. What matters: responsibility is named and cooperation is organised.

A
Advanced
Roles and mandates are defined in every relevant function, cooperation runs through a fixed cross-functional format, and the work is resourced (central budget or the functions' own budgets).
B
Established
Responsibility is assigned by name in the relevant functions, and a coordinator or committee brings them together regularly. Resources are agreed case by case.
C
Developing
One department owns adaptation measures and draws on other functions when needed.
D
Entry
Single person or function handles it informally.
E
Passive
No clear owner below board level.

Recommendations (19)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Governance & Strategy, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftEstablish board accountabilityG1.2

Add climate adaptation to the board charter, name an accountable director and add it to the standing agenda.

All archetypes
SoftName an executive sponsorG1.5

Name one executive sponsor for adaptation measures, with a clear mandate and a reporting line to the board. Day-to-day responsibility can stay in the functions.

All archetypes
SoftSet first adaptation targetsG1.3

Agree three to five adaptation targets for the next 12 months, each with an owner and a date.

Real economyServices providers
SoftSet chief risk officer (CRO) mandate for adaptation

Give the chief risk officer (CRO) explicit authority over physical-risk underwriting appetite, reinsurance strategy and catastrophe-model governance.

Financial services
SoftEmbed adaptation in credit risk committee

Write physical-climate adaptation into the credit risk committee mandate, with quarterly reporting on exposed segments.

Financial services
SoftIssue adaptation stewardship statement

Publish a clear stewardship position on climate adaptation, with voting and engagement priorities for investee companies.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftEmbed adaptation in 5-year strategic planG1.1 · G1.4

Write adaptation objectives into the strategic plan with named projects, capex lines and measurable milestones.

Real economyServices providers
SoftPut adaptation costs into the budget cycleG1.4

Add a planning line for adaptation measures to the next capex and opex cycle, derived from the identified climate risks.

Real economyServices providers
SoftOrganise cooperation across functionsG1.5

Name the responsible people in operations, procurement, finance, risk and HR and bring them together in a fixed quarterly format.

Real economyServices providers
SoftFix a board reporting cycleG1.2

Report to the board at least once a year on climate risk and on progress of the adaptation measures.

Real economyServices providers
SoftUnderwriting governance for climate risk

Set underwriting guidelines, peril loads and portfolio limits explicitly reflecting physical-climate adaptation requirements.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation in credit policy & appetite

Embed physical-climate adaptation considerations in credit policy, risk appetite statement and sector playbooks.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation in investment policy

Integrate adaptation criteria into investment policy, mandate design and manager selection frameworks.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftLink KPIs to executive incentivesG1.3

Include adaptation milestones in long-term incentive plans for the executive team.

All archetypes
SoftMake adaptation a strategic pillarG1.1

State adaptation as a board-level strategic priority with multi-year capex and external commitment.

All archetypes
SoftDisclose in line with IFRS S2 and ESRS E1G1.2

Move governance disclosure from compliance to a capital-markets narrative, aligned with IFRS S2 and, in the EU, ESRS E1.

All archetypes
SoftPublish underwriting-adaptation strategy

Make the underwriting-adaptation stance public and investor-grade; differentiate on resilience in chosen markets.

Financial services
SoftPublish adaptation finance strategy

Announce an adaptation-finance strategy with product targets, portfolio share commitments and public progress reporting.

Financial services
SoftLead an adaptation stewardship coalition

Convene or co-lead a stewardship coalition on adaptation across asset owners and managers, with shared expectations of investees.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Business-Continuity & Emergency PlanningParametric Climate InsuranceCapacity, Training & PartnershipsClimate Risk Analytics & ModellingEarth Observation & Monitoring DataOpen the Adaptation Stack →
2

Risk & Impact Understanding

Physical-risk identification, scenarios, forward-looking information.

View

How systematically climate hazards are identified across operations, assets and value chain, assessed under multiple scenarios and time horizons, and integrated into enterprise risk management.

Usually answered by: Enterprise risk management, sustainability, insurance

Questions & criteria

R2.1Has the organisation conducted a physical climate risk assessment of its assets and operations?Criteria

Existence and scope of a physical risk assessment.

A
Advanced
Continuous, enterprise-wide assessment integrated into decisions.
B
Established
Comprehensive assessment, periodically updated.
C
Developing
Assessment covering main assets and operations.
D
Entry
One-off partial assessment.
E
Passive
No assessment conducted.
R2.2Are climate risks assessed under multiple scenarios (warming paths) and time horizons?Criteria

Whether you test several warming scenarios across several time horizons.

A
Advanced
Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) or stress-testing across multiple plausible futures and horizons.
B
Established
Multi-scenario, multi-horizon approach embedded in planning.
C
Developing
Standardised multi-scenario approach with at least three time horizons, applied consistently.
D
Entry
At least two contrasting scenarios (one lower, one higher warming) and at least two time horizons.
E
Passive
Single scenario or no scenario, one short-term horizon.
R2.3Is climate risk integrated into the enterprise risk management (ERM) framework?Criteria

Whether climate sits inside ERM rather than as a side process.

A
Advanced
Climate is a core driver in risk management, influencing risk appetite and capital allocation.
B
Established
Climate fully integrated into ERM with owners and mitigation.
C
Developing
Climate risk part of ERM with some controls.
D
Entry
Climate noted in risk register, not integrated.
E
Passive
Climate risk separate or not tracked.
R2.4Which data do you use to assess climate hazards: past loss data only, or also forward-looking information?Criteria

Forward-looking information means (1) climate projections and climate scenario analysis for the coming decades and (2) short-term forecasts and early-warning services. Past loss data means records of natural catastrophe (NatCat) damage.

A
Advanced
Forward-looking information is the main basis for decisions and is updated whenever new projections or forecasts become available.
B
Established
Forward-looking information is used for all material sites and decisions, following a defined process.
C
Developing
Past loss data, plus forward-looking information in individual cases.
D
Entry
Past natural catastrophe loss data only.
E
Passive
No structured data on climate hazards used.

Recommendations (20)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Risk & Impact Understanding, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftRun a baseline climate hazard screeningR2.1

Screen all sites and key exposures against the climate hazards relevant to their locations, using public datasets.

All archetypes
SoftIdentify your top 10 exposuresR2.1

Prioritise the assets, products or revenue streams most exposed to acute and chronic risk.

All archetypes
SoftEnter climate risk in the risk registerR2.3

Add physical climate risk to the corporate risk register, with an owner and a first rating.

Real economyServices providers
SoftAdd forward-looking data to your loss historyR2.4

Complement past loss records with public climate projections and early-warning services for your main locations.

Real economyServices providers
SoftCatastrophe-model coverage review

Audit catastrophe-model coverage across geographies and perils; identify gaps for emerging risks (wildfire, heat, flood).

Financial services
SoftLoan-book physical-risk screening

Overlay the corporate and real-estate loan book against hazard data; flag material geographies and sectors.

Financial services
SoftPortfolio physical-risk screening

Screen listed and private holdings against hazard data; identify concentration on exposed locations and sectors.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftIntegrate adaptation into enterprise risk management (ERM)R2.3

Adopt the ISO 14091/14092 frame and embed adaptation risks alongside other enterprise risks.

All archetypes
SoftMulti-scenario stress testR2.2

Run 1.5, 2 and 3+ degree scenario analyses across your top exposures and timeframes.

All archetypes
SoftQuantify value-at-riskR2.1 · R2.3

Translate physical risk into financial value-at-risk, anchored in IFRS S2 expectations.

All archetypes
SoftBusiness-unit resilience scorecardsR2.3

Bring physical-risk metrics into business unit reviews: every business unit reports on its main climate hazards, mitigations and residual risk.

Real economyServices providers
SoftClimate-conditioned loads in pricing

Embed forward-looking climate loads into technical pricing, with governance around peril parameters and scenarios.

Financial services
SoftPhysical risk in credit scoring

Integrate location-based physical-risk signals into borrower probability of default and loss given default (PD/LGD), covenants and pricing.

Financial services
SoftScenario-linked portfolio value-at-risk (VaR)

Produce portfolio-level climate value-at-risk (VaR) across scenarios; report to investment committee (IC) and asset-owner clients at least annually.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftEmbed scenarios in strategyR2.2

Use scenarios in the 5-year plan, capital allocation and product / pricing decisions.

All archetypes
SoftDisclose decision-grade impactR2.1

Publish quantified impact in line with IFRS S2 and, in the EU, ESRS E1.

All archetypes
SoftMake forward-looking information the defaultR2.4

Base siting, investment and insurance decisions on forward-looking information, refreshed whenever new projections appear.

Real economyServices providers
SoftForward-looking catastrophe-model recalibration

Build a programme to recalibrate catastrophe models for non-stationary climate, with external review and disclosure.

Financial services
SoftClimate stress test into capital planning

Integrate portfolio climate-stress outcomes into internal capital adequacy assessment process (ICAAP) and capital allocation, beyond regulatory exercises.

Financial services
SoftIntegrated climate-risk analytics

Roll out consistent climate-risk analytics across asset classes and mandates; use in investment committee (IC) decisions and client reporting.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Hazard Early-Warning & DetectionClimate Risk Analytics & ModellingEarth Observation & Monitoring DataOpen the Adaptation Stack →
3

Assets & Operations

Site exposure, adaptive measures, business continuity, climate-informed capex.

View

Site-level exposure assessment (modelled and physical), adaptive measures at high-risk sites, climate-informed asset decisions and risk-based upgrade of assets based on potential impacts.

Usually answered by: Site and plant management, engineering, real estate and asset management

Questions & criteria

A3.1Are operating sites assessed for their exposure to climate hazards at site level, both with models and on site?Criteria

Climate hazard models means desk-based climate hazard data; on-site checks means a physical evaluation at the site. On-site checks are expected at priority and high-risk sites; checking more sites also counts.

A
Advanced
All sites reviewed with climate hazard models, all priority and high-risk sites verified on site, and both refreshed on a fixed cycle and after relevant events.
B
Established
All sites reviewed with climate hazard models, and all priority and high-risk sites verified on site.
C
Developing
Most sites reviewed with climate hazard models, some high-risk sites verified on site.
D
Entry
High-priority sites reviewed with climate hazard models only, without on-site checks.
E
Passive
No systematic site-level review; exposure seen only at aggregate level.
A3.2Have adaptation measures been implemented at high-risk sites?Criteria

Deployment of concrete adaptation measures at the sites that need it.

A
Advanced
Continuous programme across all high-risk sites, effectiveness tracked and reviewed.
B
Established
Measures implemented and maintained at all high-risk sites.
C
Developing
Measures implemented at most high-risk sites.
D
Entry
Pilot measures at one or two sites.
E
Passive
No deployment yet.
A3.3Are new asset decisions (siting, design, investment) influenced by long-term climate projections?Criteria

How long-term climate projections shape siting, design and investment for new assets.

A
Advanced
Climate projections are standard in all siting, design and investment decisions, and designs keep later adaptation possible (for example space, load reserves, modular upgrades).
B
Established
Climate projections standard in all siting and design decisions.
C
Developing
Climate projections inform major new-asset decisions.
D
Entry
Climate considered informally for some projects.
E
Passive
No climate input in asset planning beyond legal compliance.
A3.4Are upgrades to existing assets prioritised by climate hazard exposure and business impact?Criteria

Whether upgrades to existing assets are ranked by their climate risk. Upgrades count even if they come from your general risk, maintenance or engineering process.

A
Advanced
Dynamic, impact-based upgrade roadmap reviewed against updated projections.
B
Established
Upgrades to existing assets prioritised by exposure and business impact.
C
Developing
Upgrade priorities partly based on exposure.
D
Entry
Upgrades reactive, after incidents.
E
Passive
Upgrades not prioritised by climate exposure.

Recommendations (23)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Assets & Operations, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftPrioritise critical assetsA3.4

Rank assets by climate hazard exposure and by revenue and safety criticality; set a triage list.

All archetypes
SoftBuild business-continuity plans (BCPs) for top 5 risksA3.2

Develop and test business-continuity plans for the most likely high-impact disruptions.

All archetypes
SoftSite-level climate hazard mappingA3.1

Overlay all owned and leased sites with climate hazard maps; start with the sites that carry the most revenue or sit on the critical path.

Real economyServices providers
SoftSite-level adaptation auditsA3.1 · A3.2

Commission on-the-ground adaptation audits of top-exposed sites; cost-rank mitigation options.

Real economyServices providers
SoftResilience criteria in property underwriting

Introduce resilience questions (roof, flood defences, business-continuity plan (BCP)) into property underwriting forms and pricing.

Financial services
SoftAsset-level resilience diligence

Add physical-resilience diligence to real-estate and project-finance origination for exposed locations.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation diligence in real-asset deals

Embed physical-climate and adaptation diligence in real-asset, infrastructure and real-estate transactions.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftOperational process redundancyA3.2

Cross-train staff, dual-source critical inputs, mobilise temporary capacity for disruption windows.

Real economyServices providers
SoftClimate check for new assetsA3.3

Make long-term climate projections a required input for every major siting, design and investment decision.

Real economyServices providers
GreyGrey reinforcement at top-exposed sitesA3.2

Flood walls, raised plant, redundant cooling and backup power at top-exposed sites.

All archetypes
GreenNature-based measures at site levelA3.2

Permeable surfaces, vegetation, urban canopy and sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) to reduce flood, heat and drought risk.

All archetypes
SoftResilience requirements in policy wordings

Condition coverage on adaptation measures (flood defences, wildfire defensible space, business-continuity plans (BCPs)); reflect in pricing.

Financial services
SoftLoss-prevention engineering programme

Scale pre-loss engineering and risk-mitigation advisory across the commercial book; embed in renewal process.

Financial services
SoftResilience covenants in project loans

Require borrower resilience measures (design thresholds, business-continuity plans (BCPs)) as conditions precedent for exposed projects.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation-conditional lending

Offer pricing concessions to borrowers that evidence adaptation investment in exposed assets.

Financial services
GreyAdaptation capex in real-asset plans

Write adaptation capex (physical reinforcement, redundancy) into real-asset business plans; track as a value-creation lever.

Financial services
GreenNature-based measures in real assets

Deploy nature-based solutions (green roofs, wetlands, urban canopy) across real-asset portfolios.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
GreyAsset-level adaptation roadmapA3.4

Multi-year capex roadmap mixing green and grey investment, anchored in scenario analysis.

Real economyServices providers
GreenScale nature-based portfolioA3.2

Move from pilots to portfolio-wide green infrastructure with measured co-benefits.

Real economyServices providers
SoftDesign for later adaptationA3.3

Set design standards for new assets that keep later adaptation possible: space, load reserves, modular upgrades.

Real economyServices providers
SoftResilience-linked premium programme

Offer premium discounts or enhanced coverage for validated resilience measures; publish the programme outcomes.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation-finance product line

Launch a dedicated adaptation-finance product line (green / resilience-linked / transition) with public targets.

Financial services
GreyWhole-portfolio resilience capex

Systematic multi-year resilience capex across the real-asset portfolio, with tracked risk-reduction outcomes.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Hazard Early-Warning & DetectionAsset & Grid Condition MonitoringHeat-Action Plans & H&S ProtocolsBusiness-Continuity & Emergency PlanningProperty-Level Flood BarriersOpen the Adaptation Stack →
4

People & Health

Workforce protocols, training, productivity and health.

View

Operational and workforce protocols for climate hazards with training, and tracking and managing climate-related workforce productivity loss and health impacts.

Usually answered by: Health, safety and environment (HSE), HR, site management

Questions & criteria

P4.1Are operational and workforce protocols for climate hazards (heat, river flood, heavy rain and flash flooding, storm, fire) in place and is the workforce trained on them?Criteria

Whether you have protocols for the climate hazards relevant at each site and train your workforce on them. A global company does not need every protocol everywhere.

A
Advanced
Comprehensive, tested protocols and continuous training integrated into operations.
B
Established
Documented protocols at all exposed sites for the climate hazards relevant there, with regular drills and training.
C
Developing
Protocols for the main climate hazards at the most exposed sites, basic training in place.
D
Entry
Ad-hoc protocols for one climate hazard or one site, little training.
E
Passive
No protocols or training specific to climate hazards.
P4.2Do you track and manage climate-related workforce productivity loss and health impacts?Criteria

Whether you track and manage the effect of climate on workforce productivity and health.

A
Advanced
Integrated workforce climate-health programme with data feeding planning.
B
Established
Productivity and health impacts tracked and actively managed.
C
Developing
Some tracking of climate-related productivity or health effects.
D
Entry
Anecdotal awareness, no data.
E
Passive
Not tracked or managed.

Recommendations (19)

LibraryEvery recommendation for People & Health, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftHeat & extreme-weather protocolsP4.1

Codify thresholds, work-rest cycles, hydration and shelter for outdoor and indoor work.

All archetypes
SoftEmergency communication systemP4.1

Multi-channel alerting for staff and visitors, with rehearsed escalation procedures.

All archetypes
SoftWorkforce heat-stress assessmentP4.2

Assess thermal-stress exposure across operations; deploy controls for outdoor and indoor hot environments.

Real economyServices providers
SoftHealth product review for heat morbidity

Review health and life products for heat-related morbidity; adjust pricing, coverage and prevention services.

Financial services
SoftWorkforce safety in branch network

Review climate-related safety in the branch and office network; invest in cooling, shelter and emergency procedures.

Financial services
SoftEngage investees on worker protection

Raise workforce climate-safety (heat, storms) as a standing engagement topic with investee companies.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftCommunity engagement at hot spotsP4.1

Structured engagement and impact assessment for high-exposure sites and host communities.

All archetypes
SoftSupport workers through adaptation-driven changeP4.2

Reskilling and support for workers in operations affected by adaptation-driven change.

All archetypes
SoftDrills and training at all exposed sitesP4.1

Run regular drills and training on each site's climate hazard protocols and record participation.

Real economyServices providers
SoftTrack heat-related productivity and healthP4.2

Record heat days, lost hours and heat-related incidents per site and review them with health and safety and operations.

Real economyServices providers
SoftHealth-and-life adaptation products

Develop products addressing climate-sensitive health risks (heat, vector-borne disease, air quality) for clients and employers.

Financial services
SoftCommunity-resilience lending

Design lending products for community resilience (SMEs, housing, local infrastructure) in exposed regions.

Financial services
SoftWorkforce resilience as engagement priority

Set clear stewardship expectations on workforce climate resilience; vote against poor performers.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftWorkforce adaptation skills programmeP4.1

Adaptation literacy and technical skills across the workforce; partner with local institutions.

All archetypes
SoftCommunity co-investment in resilienceP4.1

Co-invest with local authorities in community-resilience infrastructure around critical sites; publish outcomes.

Real economyServices providers
SoftFeed workforce data into planningP4.2

Use productivity and health data in shift planning, site investment and workforce planning.

Real economyServices providers
SoftParametric health & climate products

Launch parametric products for climate-related health events (heatwaves, extreme weather), with prevention bundled in.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation finance for vulnerable segments

Build an adaptation-finance offer for SMEs, smallholders and low-income segments in exposed regions.

Financial services
SoftPublish workforce-resilience stewardship outcomes

Publish year-on-year stewardship outcomes on workforce and community resilience across investees.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Workforce Heat-Stress MonitoringHeat-Action Plans & H&S ProtocolsPassive Cooling, Shading & Reflective SurfacesDistrict & Liquid Cooling SystemsUrban Green InfrastructureOpen the Adaptation Stack →
5

Value Chain Resilience

Supplier and customer exposure, diversification, collaboration.

View

Mapping upstream and downstream climate exposure differentiated by strategic importance, procurement requirements, geographic diversification and supplier collaboration.

Usually answered by: Procurement, supply chain, sales and key account management

Questions & criteria

V5.1Have you mapped the climate exposure of your upstream suppliers?Criteria

Critical suppliers are those whose failure would stop or seriously disrupt your operations. Map them for the climate hazards relevant at their locations, not for a fixed number.

A
Advanced
All critical suppliers mapped, including their key sub-suppliers (tier 2 and beyond).
B
Established
All critical suppliers mapped for the climate hazards relevant at their locations.
C
Developing
Most critical suppliers mapped.
D
Entry
A few critical suppliers mapped, for example after an incident.
E
Passive
No supplier mapping.
V5.2Is climate resilience a requirement in supplier procurement decisions?Criteria

Climate resilience across the supply chain and suppliers' requirements.

A
Advanced
Required for all critical suppliers, who also show how they manage resilience in their own supply chain.
B
Established
Climate resilience is a requirement for all critical suppliers in procurement decisions.
C
Developing
Climate resilience is considered for critical suppliers.
D
Entry
Mentioned but not enforced.
E
Passive
Not in procurement criteria.
V5.3Have you assessed the climate exposure of your downstream customers and end-markets?Criteria

Material customers, markets or portfolios are those that carry a large share of your revenue or, for financial institutions, of your book. Assess them for the climate hazards relevant to them, not for a fixed number.

A
Advanced
All material customers, markets or portfolios assessed, including the end-markets behind direct customers.
B
Established
All material customers, markets or portfolios assessed for the climate hazards relevant to them.
C
Developing
Most material customers, markets or portfolios assessed.
D
Entry
A few material customers, markets or portfolios assessed.
E
Passive
No downstream view.
V5.4Are critical inputs and operations diversified geographically against climate concentration risk?Criteria

Whether you diversify to reduce climate concentration risk.

A
Advanced
Resilient, multi-region footprint actively managed against climate risk.
B
Established
Deliberate geographic diversification against climate concentration.
C
Developing
Some diversification of critical inputs or sites.
D
Entry
Concentration known, no action.
E
Passive
Geographic concentration not assessed.
V5.5Do you actively collaborate with suppliers on adaptation measures (joint assessments, shared roadmaps)?Criteria

Joint action along the supply chain.

A
Advanced
Co-investment and shared resilience targets across the value chain.
B
Established
Shared adaptation roadmaps with critical suppliers.
C
Developing
Joint assessments with critical suppliers.
D
Entry
One-off conversations.
E
Passive
No collaboration.

Recommendations (19)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Value Chain Resilience, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftMap tier-1 exposureV5.1

Overlay tier-1 suppliers / counterparties against climate hazard data to identify hot spots.

All archetypes
SoftIdentify single-source riskV5.4

List critical components, ingredients and services with no qualified backup.

All archetypes
SoftFirst view of customer exposureV5.3

List your material customers and markets and check their locations against climate hazard data.

Real economyServices providers
SoftReinsurance counterparty exposure

Map reinsurance counterparties against peril concentrations; identify aggregation and correlation risk.

Financial services
SoftBorrower value-chain resilience

Integrate the borrower's value-chain climate resilience into credit assessments, particularly in sectors with high supply chain concentration.

Financial services
SoftSupply-chain disclosure engagement

Make tier-2 climate disclosure and supplier-resilience a top-3 engagement priority for exposed sectors.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftDiversify critical supply / counterpartiesV5.4

Qualify alternates, build buffer stock and dual-source the most exposed inputs or counterparties.

All archetypes
SoftAdaptation clauses in contractsV5.2

Embed adaptation expectations and reporting in supplier / counterparty terms; pilot with strategic relationships.

All archetypes
SoftSupplier capability-buildingV5.5

Build supplier adaptation capability: training, shared risk tools, pre-qualification criteria.

Real economyServices providers
SoftRetrocession concentration limits

Apply concentration limits in retrocession and fronting arrangements for correlated climate perils.

Financial services
SoftValue-chain covenants in lending

Require borrower value-chain resilience disclosures and action plans as covenants for material loans.

Financial services
SoftEngage on tier-2 supplier disclosure

Engage investee companies on tier-2 supplier mapping and adaptation disclosure, with escalation pathways.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftCo-invest in resilienceV5.5

Joint investment, financing and capability building for strategic suppliers or counterparties in exposed regions.

All archetypes
SoftMap critical sub-suppliers (tier 2 and beyond)V5.1

Go one layer deeper: map the critical tier-2 dependencies behind your critical suppliers in exposed geographies.

Real economyServices providers
SoftJoint supplier adaptation fundV5.5

Fund adaptation capex at strategic suppliers through dedicated vehicles; lock in long-term supply.

Real economyServices providers
SoftCustomer adaptation dialogueV5.3

Embed adaptation requirements and support into key customer relationships and tenders.

Real economyServices providers
SoftReinsurance diversification for climate

Active diversification programme for reinsurance counterparties across climate-sensitive perils and regions.

Financial services
SoftValue-chain adaptation finance

Offer adaptation finance across client value chains (anchor + suppliers + distributors).

Financial services
SoftPortfolio value-chain transparency

Drive portfolio-wide value-chain adaptation transparency through coordinated engagement and benchmarks.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Predictive Weather RoutingBusiness-Continuity & Emergency PlanningSupplier Diversification & Buffer StockSmart Irrigation & Precision WaterAtmospheric Water GenerationOpen the Adaptation Stack →
6

Monitoring & Learning

Real-time monitoring, lessons, progress KPIs, benchmarking.

View

Real-time event monitoring, structured lessons-learned, progress KPIs shared across functions, and benchmarking against peers and standards.

Usually answered by: Risk management, operations, business continuity, controlling

Questions & criteria

M6.1Do you monitor climate events affecting operations in real time?Criteria

Real-time monitoring of climate events as they hit operations.

A
Advanced
Integrated monitoring feeding automated response and planning.
B
Established
Real-time monitoring across operations with alerts.
C
Developing
Real-time monitoring for high-risk sites.
D
Entry
Manual or reactive monitoring.
E
Passive
No real-time monitoring.
M6.2Are lessons captured systematically after climate incidents?Criteria

Whether you turn incidents into lessons that update your protocols.

A
Advanced
Lessons captured after every climate incident and near miss; the resulting protocol changes are tracked to completion and shared across sites.
B
Established
Lessons captured after every climate incident through a defined process and fed back into protocols.
C
Developing
Lessons captured for major incidents.
D
Entry
Informal debriefs.
E
Passive
No formal lessons-learned process.
M6.3Do you measure progress on climate resilience and adaptation measures with key performance indicators (KPIs)?Criteria

Progress measurement inside the company, separate from external reporting. A climate adaptation KPI is a figure you track over time, for example the share of high-risk sites with measures in place, downtime from climate events, or the share of critical suppliers mapped. KPIs on risk reduction and on adaptation opportunities both count.

A
Advanced
KPIs carry targets and steer decisions: budgets, priorities or incentives follow them.
B
Established
KPIs are shared across risk, finance, operations and sustainability and reviewed on a fixed cycle.
C
Developing
KPIs are defined and tracked within one function.
D
Entry
KPIs are being defined.
E
Passive
No KPIs for climate resilience or adaptation measures.
M6.4Do you benchmark your adaptation performance against peers and standards?Criteria

Whether you compare yourself against peers and standards.

A
Advanced
Benchmarking drives target-setting and disclosure.
B
Established
Regular benchmarking against peers and standards.
C
Developing
Occasional benchmarking against standards.
D
Entry
Aware of standards, no comparison.
E
Passive
No benchmarking.

Recommendations (19)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Monitoring & Learning, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftDefine 3-5 leading KPIsM6.3

Move from activity tracking to outcome KPIs at programme and dimension level.

All archetypes
SoftEarly-warning indicatorsM6.1

Implement watch indicators for your main climate hazards, integrated with enterprise risk management (ERM) dashboards.

All archetypes
SoftDebrief after every climate incidentM6.2

Hold a short structured debrief after each climate incident and record what changes as a result.

Real economyServices providers
SoftClimate-attribution on cat losses

Start attributing catastrophe losses to climate signals; build a peril-level attribution framework.

Financial services
SoftClimate-event portfolio impact tracking

Track portfolio-quality impact after climate events (NPL migration, restructurings) in exposed segments.

Financial services
SoftPortfolio adaptation maturity tracking

Track investee adaptation maturity (this standard or equivalent) across the portfolio year on year.

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftPost-event reviewsM6.2

Structured after-action reviews after every material disruption, feeding programme updates.

All archetypes
SoftAnnual maturity reassessmentM6.4

Re-run this assessment yearly; track movement on the radar over time.

All archetypes
SoftOperational KPI dashboardM6.3

Executive dashboard tracking adaptation KPIs by business unit, with thresholds, trends and owner sign-off.

Real economyServices providers
SoftReal-time alerts for high-risk sitesM6.1

Connect weather and climate hazard alert services to site management at all high-risk sites.

Real economyServices providers
SoftPeril-level loss decomposition

Decompose loss experience by peril, geography and climate signal; feed into pricing and capital models.

Financial services
SoftCredit-loss climate attribution

Attribute credit-loss experience to climate events and physical-risk drivers for management reporting.

Financial services
SoftPortfolio adaptation benchmarking

Benchmark portfolio-level adaptation maturity against peers and public commitments.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftExternal assuranceM6.3

Move adaptation reporting under external assurance; align with IFRS S2 disclosure expectations.

All archetypes
SoftIndustry benchmarkingM6.4

Participate in cross-industry benchmarks and publish year-on-year progress.

All archetypes
SoftLink monitoring to responseM6.1

Feed monitoring data into shutdown, rerouting and staffing decisions and into planning.

Real economyServices providers
SoftPredictive climate-loss modelling

Invest in predictive, forward-looking climate-loss analytics; share methodology with regulators and markets.

Financial services
SoftReal-time climate-credit monitoring

Real-time monitoring of climate-driven credit migration across the portfolio with early-warning triggers.

Financial services
SoftPublished portfolio resilience report

Publish an annual portfolio resilience report: maturity, stewardship outcomes, scenario impact.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Hazard Early-Warning & DetectionWorkforce Heat-Stress MonitoringPredictive Weather RoutingAsset & Grid Condition MonitoringDamage Assessment & Rapid RestorationOpen the Adaptation Stack →
7

Opportunities & Strategic Shift

Opportunity identification, positioning, regulatory anticipation.

View

Turning adaptation into opportunity: identifying adaptation-driven markets, positioning and investment, and anticipating regulatory and market shifts.

Usually answered by: Strategy, business development, product management, R&D

Questions & criteria

O7.1Have you identified adaptation-driven market opportunities (products, services, geographies) and the adaptation economy you could participate in?Criteria

Whether you spot adaptation-driven markets and the wider adaptation economy you could serve.

A
Advanced
Opportunities are a strategic input, with a mapped adaptation-economy ecosystem.
B
Established
Structured opportunity pipeline across products, services and geographies.
C
Developing
Opportunities identified for parts of the business.
D
Entry
Some opportunities noted informally.
E
Passive
No opportunity mapping.
O7.2Is climate adaptation positioned as a strategic differentiator, backed by investment in adaptation-related products, services or business lines?Criteria

Whether resilience is a market differentiator you actually invest in.

A
Advanced
Adaptation central to positioning, with material investment and revenue.
B
Established
Adaptation a clear differentiator with funded initiatives.
C
Developing
Some positioning plus early investment.
D
Entry
Marketing claims only.
E
Passive
Not a differentiator; no specific investment.
O7.3Do you anticipate regulatory and market shifts that drive adaptation demand, and prepare to capture them?Criteria

Whether you anticipate regulatory and market shifts rather than react to them.

A
Advanced
You shape regulation and markets, moving first to capture new adaptation demand.
B
Established
You actively prepare for likely shifts, with plans and budget in place.
C
Developing
You anticipate the main shifts for your core business, but without concrete plans yet.
D
Entry
You track regulation and market signals, but do not act on them.
E
Passive
You react to regulation only once it applies.

Recommendations (20)

LibraryEvery recommendation for Opportunities & Strategic Shift, grouped by maturity tierShow
Passive · Entry
Start: if you are at Passive or Entry, begin here
SoftMap adaptation opportunitiesO7.1

Workshop and document where adaptation needs intersect with your capabilities, clients or markets.

All archetypes
SoftIdentify clients needing supportO7.1

Segment clients by climate exposure; design conversations for the most exposed.

All archetypes
SoftScan for adaptation-relevant product linesO7.1

Audit product and service portfolio for those that become more valuable under a warmer, more volatile climate.

Real economyServices providers
SoftTrack regulatory and market signalsO7.3

Assign someone to follow adaptation-related regulation, standards and customer requirements and brief management twice a year.

Real economyServices providers
SoftParametric & resilience product scan

Scan for parametric, index-based and resilience-linked product opportunities across lines of business.

Financial services
SoftScope adaptation-finance opportunities

Scope the adaptation-finance pipeline (green, sustainability-linked, resilience-linked) across sectors.

Financial services
SoftScreen for adaptation-themed investments

Build a screen for adaptation-themed listed and private-market opportunities (water, cooling, resilient agri).

Financial services
Developing
Build: if you are Developing, build the programme
SoftPilot 1-2 new offeringsO7.2

Launch pilots in adaptation-relevant products or services; measure unit economics fast.

All archetypes
SoftResearch and development (R&D) and innovation budget for adaptationO7.2

Allocate a defined share of research and development (R&D) or innovation spend to adaptation-led innovation with stage gates.

All archetypes
SoftPrepare for the main regulatory and market shiftsO7.3

Pick the two or three regulatory and market shifts most relevant to your core business and give each a plan and a budget.

Real economyServices providers
SoftLaunch parametric pilot products

Pilot parametric products (heat, flood, drought, hurricane) for commercial or retail segments.

Financial services
SoftResilience-linked lending pilot

Pilot resilience-linked loans with KPIs tied to client adaptation investment and outcomes.

Financial services
SoftPilot an adaptation-themed strategy

Launch a pilot adaptation-themed fund or sleeve; track performance, flows and client demand.

Financial services
Established · Advanced
Lead: if you are Established or Advanced, push the frontier
SoftPortfolio rebalancingO7.2

Shift capital from stranded exposures into climate-resilient growth markets.

All archetypes
SoftPosition the brand on adaptationO7.2

Build market-facing leadership: reporting, partnerships and thought leadership on adaptation.

All archetypes
SoftScale adaptation revenueO7.2

Commit a share of core revenue to adaptation-relevant products and services; report it year on year.

Real economyServices providers
SoftHelp shape standards and marketsO7.3

Take part in standard-setting and industry initiatives so that new adaptation demand meets your offer first.

Real economyServices providers
SoftCommercial parametric & resilience portfolio

Build a material, disclosed portfolio of parametric and resilience products; position in the market.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation finance at scale

Scale adaptation finance to a material share of the balance sheet; publish targets and track delivery.

Financial services
SoftAdaptation-themed flagship fund

Launch a flagship adaptation-themed fund or mandate with clear KPIs, impact reporting and client backing.

Financial services

Matching solutions in the WG3 stack

Solution categories that address this dimension
Drought-Tolerant Crops, Seeds & Bio-stimulantsCoastal Nature-Based DefenceUrban Green InfrastructureBio-based Industrial Water SolutionsParametric Climate InsuranceOpen the Adaptation Stack →

How scoring works

04 · From answers to snapshot
01 Per question

Pick the level that fits

Each question is answered on the five-level scale, A to E (Advanced to Passive). Each level has an explicit criterion; the answer that best matches your situation today is the honest one to pick. If two levels fit, take the lower one.

02 Outside the score

Not relevant, or don't know

"Not relevant for us" excludes a topic that does not apply to your business model, so it does not drag your maturity down. "Don't know / not my area" excludes a question you cannot answer and lists it in your result as an open question for colleagues. A dimension without any scored answer stays visible in the profile and is labelled with the reason.

03 Roll-up

Dimension and overall score

Each dimension averages its answered questions into a 0 to 4 score (Passive to Advanced), shown to one decimal place. The overall score is the equal-weighted average across all seven dimensions.

The framework is qualitative-first by design: the goal is an honest baseline and a clear set of priority gaps, not a precise number.

Glossary

05 · Key terms

The terms below carry the same meaning in every question. In the assessment they appear as a mouse-over wherever a question uses them.

Physical climate risk
Risk of damage, disruption or loss from climate hazards. Acute: flood, storm, heatwave, wildfire. Chronic: rising temperatures, water scarcity, sea level rise. Transition risk (policy, technology and market change on the way to net zero) is a different topic and outside this assessment.
Climate hazard
A climate-related event or trend that can cause harm: heat, river flood, heavy rain and flash flood, storm, wildfire, drought, sea level rise. In this assessment the word never refers to hazardous substances.
Exposure
Whether and how strongly a site, supplier or customer lies in the path of a climate hazard.
Climate resilience
The ability to anticipate, withstand and recover from climate hazards, and to keep operating and creating value as the climate changes.
Adaptation measures
Concrete actions that reduce the harm from climate hazards. Examples: flood barriers, raised electrical equipment, cooling and shading, heat-adjusted shift plans, backup power and water, a second supplier in another region. Measures count even if they run under a general risk, maintenance or engineering label.
Assets and operations
Your sites, buildings and equipment and the processes that run on them. Financial services lens: the assets and clients you finance, insure or invest in.
Forward-looking information
Climate projections and climate scenario analysis for the coming decades, plus short-term forecasts and early-warning services. The opposite is past loss data.
Climate scenario analysis
Testing your exposure under several warming paths (for example one lower and one higher path) and several time horizons (for example 2030, 2040, 2050).
NatCat
Natural catastrophe. Past loss data means the record of damage from events such as floods, storms and hail.
Enterprise risk management (ERM)
The company-wide process that identifies, rates and steers all major risks, usually with a risk register, named risk owners and regular reporting to the board.
Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU)
Planning methods that look for decisions that hold up across many plausible futures, instead of optimising for one forecast.
Climate adaptation KPI
A figure you track over time to see whether resilience improves. Examples: share of high-risk sites with measures in place, downtime from climate events, share of critical suppliers mapped.
Critical supplier
A supplier whose failure would stop or seriously disrupt your operations.
Material customers, markets or portfolios
Those that carry a large share of your revenue or, for financial institutions, of your book.
Not relevant for us
The topic does not apply to your business model. The question leaves the score.
Don't know / not my area
The topic applies, but you cannot answer it. The question leaves the score and appears in your result as an open question to hand to colleagues.

Back to the assessment

CC BY-SA 4.0© 2026 Adaptation Exchange, hosted by DSR Partners GmbH. The Climate Resilience Maturity Assessment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). You are free to use, share and adapt it, provided you credit the Adaptation Exchange and share your adaptations under the same licence.

The licence covers the content: questions, maturity criteria, recommendations, glossary and methodology. The software code, the name "Adaptation Exchange" and the logo are not part of the licence.

How to cite: Adaptation Exchange (2026): Climate Resilience Maturity Assessment, v3.2. adaptation-exchange.org. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.